Editorial Notes
Codification
Sections expired by their own terms. They provided as follows:
Feb. 25, 1920, ch. 85, § 1341 Stat. 441Aug. 21, 1935, ch. 599, § 149 Stat. 674Section 221, acts , ; , , provided for prospecting permits, their terms and conditions, extension, location of lands, marking land, notice of application for permits, permits in Alaska, exchanging permits for leases, and limited extensions to .
act Jan. 11, 1922, ch. 2842 Stat. 356Section 222, , , authorized Secretary of the Interior to extend time for drilling not to exceed three years.
act Apr. 5, 1926, ch. 107, § 144 Stat. 236Section 222a, , , authorized a further extension of two years for drilling.
act Apr. 5, 1926, ch. 107, § 244 Stat. 236Section 222b, , , provided for extension of expired permits for a period of two years from .
act Mar. 9, 1928, ch. 168, § 145 Stat. 252Section 222c, , , authorized a two year extension for permits.
act Mar. 9, 1928, ch. 168, § 245 Stat. 252Section 222d, , , authorized a two year extension of permits already expired.
act Jan. 23, 1930, ch. 25, § 146 Stat. 58Section 222e, , , provided that permits issued or extended for three years might be further for three years.
act Jan. 23, 1930, ch. 25, § 246 Stat. 59Section 222f, , , provided for an extension of permits already expired for a period of three years from .
act June 30, 1932, ch. 319, § 147 Stat. 445Section 222g, , , provided for a further extension of three years.
act June 30, 1932, ch. 319, § 247 Stat. 446Section 222h, , , authorized an extension, for permits already expired, of three years from .
Aug. 26, 1937, ch. 82850 Stat. 842Aug. 11, 1939, ch. 71653 Stat. 1418Section 222i, acts , ; , , provided for final extension of prospecting permits, outstanding on , to .
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Compromise of Claims for Accrued Rental
Act July 29, 1942, ch. 534, § 256 Stat. 726section 221 of this title, , authorized Secretary of the Interior to make a compromise settlement of any claim for accrued rental under a lease issued pursuant to the provisions of , in any case in which he determined that it would be financially beneficial to the United States to make such a compromise settlement or in any case in which he determined that collection of the full amount of such accrued rental from the lessee was inadvisable because of the lessee’s financial resources being limited.